Editorial rejection: “you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers”

Editorial rejection: “you aren't citing articles of Statistical Papers”

The log Statistical Papers, with editorial workplace at the University of Dortmund rejects all manuscript submissions in the event that writers usually do not cite documents out of this journal that is springer-published. The editors claim it's maybe maybe perhaps not about effect element rigging.

Every so often, researchers publishing their work with book encounter a request from editors to cite some random previous documents from exact same log. Why? One explanation: the impact is raised by it element. In reality, for many journals it really is perhaps the unofficial guideline that such journal-self-citations are required, or your paper will likely be refused. Some boffins abide ahead of time, in order to make editors pleased. Many other people have a problem with the idea that they find unethical. The German editor of this Springer log Statistical Papers will explain for you right here why here is the scientifically proper and completely objective solution to run a log.

A conversation grew up on Twitter recently, for the duration of which neither the log not the editor had been called.

Mark Hayter, teacher of medical at University of Hull in British and a log editor himself, tweeted:

“A PhD student of mine possessed a paper accepted – one condition of acceptance ended up being that she ratings her sources and includes any appropriate current documents through the journal that is accepting”

Then he included the log was predatory that is“Not. Distinguished journal, person in COPE and from a sizable,international publishing house” as well as specified her to review her references and include ‘recent, relevant’ papers from the accepting Journal that“They asked. No certain documents had been suggested“. Ended up, Hayter had not been alone with this experience:

A reviewer ( maybe maybe not editor) as soon as told us to include citations from that log during my modification. a high log too. Very strange. I obtained into the practice of including a few journal cites to wherever I’m submitting and very nearly forget to consider the ethics. This really is waking me up.

More anecdotes arrived, like that one through the certain section of medication:

Certainly, a method to falsely inflate impact facets.

There clearly was another cardiology that is international historically that insisted you cite their ethics declaration (posted being a paper).

It absolutely was cited a great deal, their impact relocated from circa 2 to over 6 in 36 months. #gaming #unethical

All the replies had been critical, such as this advice through the Hindawi research integrity supervisor Matt Hodgkinson:

For many we all know, the writers could have valued the Twitter outrage after which simply did exactly just exactly psychology research paper example what the editor said and quoted some papers that are random the log. Why making enemies, in the place of making documents? Some boffins revealed also understanding when it comes to policy:

We have mixed feelings concerning this. One argument is the fact that you are targeting a community of scholars if you choose a particular journal. It really is rational to test whatever they have previously stated regarding the subject while the place that is logical begin may be the journal you've selected.

Now Professor Stephen John Senn of Luxembourg Institute of wellness is really a statistician, he can certainly concur that the following policy for the log Statistical Papers is okay as it's. I mean, when your work is printed in the form of a paper which is about statistics, you sure must cite something using this specially significant log, exactly just what because of the title, “Statistical Papers“, right?

It was the e-mail an audience forwarded in my experience, a recently gotten answer their refused manuscript submission:

Dear …., your paper has some merits. Nonetheless, because of the enormous amount of submissions we have been getting recently we now have chose to concentrate on documents that are associated with past work published within our log. And also this will not appear to be the situation along with your paper as you aren't citing articles of Statistical Papers. Furthermore, the guide list just isn't of good quality: sometimes the pages associated with log articles are missing.Thank you for providing us the chance to consider carefully your work.Yours sincerelyChristine H. MьllerEditor-in-Chief, Statistical Papers

We contacted the EiC Christine Mьller, teacher of data in engineering in the Technical University of Dortmund (TU Dortmund) in Germany. She responded, confirming the e-mail authenticity:

“Due to your amount that is high of, we must set strict criteria, and two of these will be the quality of this paper in addition to relationship to many other papers of our log. Then we usually ask for a resubmission if the quality is ok and only Statistical Papers is not cited. Nonetheless, right right here the product quality, suggested by the guide list, is apparently debateable.”

I happened to be unconvinced this training had nothing in connection with the Journal effect Factor (presently at 1.345 for analytical documents) and in addition puzzled the way the editors could solely judge a manuscript based on its reference formatting (“page numbers missing”). Mьller then clarified:

“we intend to be sure that submissions fit into the log and an indicator that is good frequently just how well it's linked to past work in our log. Note that people generally usually do not judge that entirely by whether another SP-paper is cited or otherwise not since you may see from checking our published articles (the self-citation price of SP just isn't more than compared to comparable journals and you might remember that anyhow just cites of within three years affect the IF). Needless to say the grade of a paper isn't judged by the reference formatting. Nevertheless, we've the ability that a sloppy guide list is an indicator of the sloppy written paper. We genuinely believe that editors of other journals need the experience that is same could make comparable conclusions. Thus the remark regarding the guide part had been intended being an ongoing solution into the writer.”

That e-mail ended up being finalized by Christine Mьller therefore the other two main editors, Carsten Jentsch, professor of data in economics at exact exact same TU Dortmund, and Werner Mьller, teacher at Institute for Applied Statistics at University of Linz, Austria.

The journal’s writers seem to follow these unofficial editorial guidelines. We looked over initial 3 recently published studies in Statistical Papers (all incidentally from Asia), one recommendations 4 documents here, another sources 2, 3rd recommendations 1 paper in same log. It is the range of Statistical Papers really that narrow? This is exactly what the log internet site states in this respect:

“Statistical Papers provides a forum for the presentation and assessment that is critical of techniques. In specific, the log encourages the conversation of methodological fundamentals along with possible applications.

This log stresses analytical techniques which have broad applications; nonetheless, it can provide unique focus on statistical practices which are highly relevant to the commercial and social sciences. As well as initial research documents, visitors will discover study articles, brief records, reports on analytical computer computer pc software, issue part, and book reviews”

Nowhere it really is mentioned that the submissions must cite some random papers that are past exact same log to match the range. The assigned publisher administrator from Springer decided on never to respond to my email messages, and just why as long as they. The editors do their finest to improve the journal’s citation index.

But also for argument’s sake, if Statistical Papers is unique split field research, certainly the Editor-in-Chief is likely to be expert when it comes to particular technology part of “Statistical Papers”? Unfortuitously, she actually is certainly not. an extended selection of publications is posted by Christine Mьller on the TU Dortmund internet site, from 1984 till now, presumably her whole research production, since maybe perhaps not otherwise specified. Yet just two of Mьller’s analytical documents showed up inside her log Statistical Papers, which can be posted since 1960 (until 1995, even yet in German). Her namesake editor colleague Werner Mьller comes with simply two documents in this log to exhibit, while Jentsch will not record a publication that is single Statistical Papers on their web site.

Fundamentally, they've been industry outsiders associated with the niche that is obscure technology of Statistical Papers, having hardly (or otherwise not at all) published here on their own. Or even their very own journal’s impact element is too low and requires boosting before Mьller, Mьller & Jentsch ponder over it as a place?

In the event that you had comparable experiences with editors imposing citation that is own-journal, please contemplate sharing these below within the remark area.

Buy Now